Experimental Evidence on Inequity Aversion and Self-Selection between Incentive Contracts
نویسنده
چکیده
When only group performance is observable, incentives depend on the distribution of payments between group members. This distribution differs between firms. In this paper, we analyze whether the coexistence of various group performance-based payment schemes on the labor market can be related to agents’ heterogeneity. We test by a laboratory experiment whether agents self-select between a competitive and a revenue-sharing payment scheme. The theory predicts a sorting of agents based on their preferences and an increase of the efficiency when the payment schemes are freely chosen by agents. Data confirm the predictions. Low inequity averse agents self-select into the competitive scheme and they are more likely to choose it if their risk aversion is low. The efficiency is increasing when the payment schemes are freely chosen. The results go in favor of a flexible labor market that leads to a better matching between compensation schemes and agents’ preferences. JEL classification: C92, D03, J33, M52.
منابع مشابه
Optimal incentive contracts under inequity aversion
Optimal Incentive Contracts under Inequity Aversion We analyze the Moral Hazard problem, assuming that agents are inequity averse. Our results differ from conventional contract theory and are more in line with empirical findings than standard results. We find: First, inequity aversion alters the structure of optimal contracts. Second, there is a strong tendency towards linear sharing rules. Thi...
متن کاملInequity Aversion , Adverse Selection and Employment Contracts ∗
This paper analyzes the interaction of fairness concerns and social comparisons with asymmetric information and incentives within the context of a firm’s employment decision. It studies optimal, incentive-compatible employment contracts if each worker is inequity averse he suffers from being ‘worse off’ than his colleagues and has private information about his productivity. Inequity aversion is...
متن کاملNo . 34 Do Incentive Contracts Undermine Voluntary Cooperation ?
In this paper we provide experimental evidence indicating that incentive contracts may undermine voluntary cooperation. This suggests that explicit incentives may have costly side effects that have been largely neglected by economists. In our experiments the undermining effect is so strong that the incentive contracts are less efficient than contracts without any incentives. Buyers, who are in ...
متن کاملJoint Contract under Inequity Aversion
The standard contract theory adopts the traditional hypothesis of pure self-interest. However, a series of game experiments have proven that people are not any self-interest but also inequity averse. Then, how will the inequity aversion influence the optimal contract for multiple agents? This paper attempts to obtain new theoretical insights by incorporating inequity aversion into the standard ...
متن کاملInequity Aversion and Moral Hazard with Multiple Agents
We analyze how inequity aversion interacts with incentive provision in an otherwise standard moral hazard model with two risk averse agents. We find that behindness aversion (suffering only when being worse off) among agents unambiguously increases agency costs of providing incentives. This holds true if agents also suffer from being better off unless they account for effort costs in their comp...
متن کامل